Living with fire.
See how communities thrive or struggle based on their approach to fire.
Toggle between approaches to compare:
Chaotic.
Vulnerable.
Prepared.
Resilient.
See how fire unfolds
Select a phase to explore:
Reactive: Before
Communities with a reactive approach to fire management often lack comprehensive preparation. Fire safety measures may be minimal, with limited investment in prevention infrastructure.
Reactive: During
When fires occur, reactive communities often face chaotic scenarios. Emergency responses may be disorganized, with agencies struggling to coordinate effectively.
Reactive: After
In the aftermath, reactive communities often face extensive rebuilding efforts with minimal pre-established recovery frameworks. Insurance challenges are common, with many residents discovering they were underinsured for fire damage.
Proactive: Before
Proactive communities invest heavily in prevention and preparedness. They implement comprehensive forest management practices, including regular controlled burns and mechanical thinning to reduce fuel loads in surrounding areas.
Proactive: During
When fires occur in proactive communities, emergency response is coordinated and efficient. Well-established communication protocols ensure residents receive timely, accurate information about the situation and necessary actions.
Proactive: After
Recovery in proactive communities typically follows pre-established plans that expedite rebuilding and restoration. Insurance claims tend to be processed more smoothly due to proper documentation and adequate coverage levels encouraged before disasters.
Limited Prevention
In reactively managed communities, there is often minimal investment in preventative fire measures before an incident occurs. This approach can leave areas vulnerable when a fire eventually strikes.
- Minimal vegetation management in fire-prone areas
- Lack of firebreaks and defensive spaces
- Limited forest maintenance and fuel reduction